|
1.
|
Essays in Philosophy:
Volume >
10 >
Issue: 2
Jessica B. Payson
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In this paper, I work within Ruth Marcus’s account of the source of moral dilemmas and articulate the implications of her theory for collective responsibility. As an extension to Marcus’s work, I explore what her account means for the moral emotions and responsibilities of those complicit in perpetuating unjust systems of a non-ideal world from which moral dilemmas arise. This move necessitates shifting away from the primacy of control. That one is born into unjust systems one had no hand in establishing does not excuse one from responsibility to mend them. Similarly, even if one’s personal contribution in the perpetuation of unjust systems is negligible – the injustices would continue whether one participated or not, and one’s resistance would do little-to-nothing – one nevertheless retains responsibility. This expanded sense of responsibility necessitates a specialized sort of moral emotion – one that, like agent-regret or tragic-remorse, transcends the criterion of agentic control, but nevertheless can be classified neither as agent-regret nor tragic-remorse.
|
|
|
2.
|
Essays in Philosophy:
Volume >
10 >
Issue: 2
Joseph Levine
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Essays in Philosophy:
Volume >
10 >
Issue: 2
A. M. Ungar
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
4.
|
Essays in Philosophy:
Volume >
10 >
Issue: 2
Miguel Martinez-Saenz
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
5.
|
Essays in Philosophy:
Volume >
10 >
Issue: 2
Steven Ross
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
6.
|
Essays in Philosophy:
Volume >
10 >
Issue: 2
Peter H. Denton
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
7.
|
Essays in Philosophy:
Volume >
10 >
Issue: 2
Michael Corrado
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|