LOGIN
PRODUCTS
All Products
Online Resources
Journals & Series
Digital Media
Books & Reference Works
E-Collection
About
Alphabetically
By Category
Price Lists
Terms and Conditions
MEMBERSHIPS
Societies & Associations
Conference Registrations
SERVICES
Conference Exhibits
Conference Registrations
Electronic Publishing
Journal Advertising
Mailing Lists
Marketing Services
Membership Services
Production Typesetting
Subscription Fulfillment
ABOUT
About us
Contact
FAQs
Order Info
Privacy
Support
This Title
All Titles
Browse
>
Volume
>
10
>
Issue: 3
>> Go to Current Issue
Business Ethics Journal Review
Volume 10, Issue 3, 2022
Table of Contents
Already a subscriber? -
Login here
Not yet a subscriber? -
Subscribe here
Browse by:
Volume
Year
--- Volume ---
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
--- Year ---
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Issue: 5
Issue: 4
Issue: 3
Issue: 2
Issue: 1
Overview
Editorial Team
RSS Feeds
E-mail Updates
Indexing / Abstracting
Submission Guidelines
Rights & Permissions
Results per page:
20
50
100
Sort by:
Page Number - ascending
Page Number - descending
Date - recent first
Date - oldest first
Title
Author
<< additional functions
Displaying: 1-1 of 1 documents
1.
Business Ethics Journal Review:
Volume
>
10
>
Issue: 3
Carson Young
How Business Ethics Can Accommodate Disruptive Innovation without Devolving into Calvinball
abstract
|
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
Abraham Singer defends the Market Failures Approach (MFA) to business ethics from the objection that the MFA cannot account for the moral value of disruptive innovation. Singer argues that critics who attack the MFA on these grounds face a dilemma: either accept the MFA, along with its general prohibition on disruptive innovation, or reject the very idea that business and market competition should be understood as rule-governed activities at all. This commentary argues that the dilemma Singer poses to MFA critics is a false one.
SHARE