|
1.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 9
Daniel Torres
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 9
William M. Shields
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 8
Barbara A. Noah
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 7
Susan Haack
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
5.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 6
Brian M. O'Connell
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
6.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 6
Philip M. Rosoff, Melanie L. Katsur
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Modern cancer treatment, while often producing lifelong cures, can also result in permanent damage to many organ systems. Although more than 70% of children and young adults can be cured of their cancers, infertility, which frequently accompanies curative therapies for many common types of cancer, is one of the most devastating long-term complications. In this paper we discuss the medical, legal, and ethical ramifications of attempting to prevent this side effect and present some of the challenges that remain.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 5
Barbara A. Elliott
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 4
Bill Shields
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
9.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3
Anne-Taylor Cahill
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
10.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3
Elizabeth A. Corley
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
11.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 2
William J. FitzPatrick, Lee L. Zwanziger
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 2
Avner Levin
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
13.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 1
David B. Resnik
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This paper discusses the idea of forming a patent pool in order to address some of the licensing problems in the biotechnology industry. The pool would be an independent, non-profit corporation that would manage patents and have the authority to grant licenses. The patent pool would not be a purely altruistic venture, since it would charge licensing fees. The pool would charge the market price for licensing services and reimburse patent holders for licensing activities. The pool would also provide patent holders with a minimum income based on a percentage of royalties generated from the pool. The pool would include patents on a variety of materials and methods that play an important role in biotechnology. It would also be international in scope, with the power to grant licenses in different countries.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 1
Doug Jesseph
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|