Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-12 of 12 documents


articles

1. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
T. Ryan Byerly

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Introductory-level undergraduate classes in Logic or Critical Thinking are a staple in the portfolio of many Philosophy programs. A standard approach to these classes is to include teaching and learning activities focused on formal deductive and inductive logic, sometimes accompanied by teaching and learning activities focused on informal fallacies or argument construction. In this article, I discuss a proposal to include an additional element within these classes—namely, teaching and learning activities focused on intellectual virtues. After clarifying the proposal, I identify three reasons in favor of implementing it and I discuss how to implement it, focusing on questions about pedagogical strategies and pedagogical resources.
2. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Daniel Collette

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
While the pedagogical benefits of experiential learning are well known, classroom technology is a more contentious topic. In my experience, philosophy instructors are hesitant to embrace technology in their pedagogy. A great deal of this trepidation is justified: when technology serves only to replicate existing methods without contributing to course objectives, it unnecessarily adds extra work for the instructor and can even be a distraction from learning. However, I believe, if applied appropriately, technology can be used to positively enhance the philosophy classroom experience in ways that are not possible in traditional classroom settings – including new ways of experiential learning. To demonstrate this, I offer a case study of implementing virtual reality (VR) as a tool for experiential learning of philosophy. I show how having students “walk a plank” off a skyscraper in VR allowed me to exceed my course objectives for my Existentialism course in particularly effective ways that I could not have done without this technology.
3. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Jesse Fitts, David Beisecker

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This paper will present two contributions to teaching introductory logic. The first contribution is an alternative tree proof method that differs from the traditional one-sided tree method. The second contribution combines this tree system with an index system to produce a user-friendly tree method for sentential modal logic.

reviews

4. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Frank Boardman

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
5. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Susan T. Gardner

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
6. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Liz Goodnick

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
7. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Gregory Havrilak

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
William B. Irvine

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Joy Laine

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Antonio Ramirez

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Alex M. Richardson

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. Teaching Philosophy: Volume > 42 > Issue: 1
Harald Thorsrud

view |  rights & permissions | cited by