Browse by:



Displaying: 81-100 of 3426 documents


reviews

81. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Jon Mahoney

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
82. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Steven D. Decaroli

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
83. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Jason M. Wirth

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
84. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Patrick Kane

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
85. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Lisa Raphals

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
86. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Manuel Chávez-Jiménez

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
87. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Julio César Díaz

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
88. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4
Yevgenia Skorobogatov-Gray

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

89. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 4

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

90. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Rex Welshon

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

91. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
James J. Winchester

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

92. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Steven Crowell

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

93. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Jessica N. Berry

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

94. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Matthew H. Meyer

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

95. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Clancy Martin

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

96. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Michael W. Grenke

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

97. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
R. Lanier Anderson

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

98. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Kathleen Marie Higgins

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

99. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Richard Schacht

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
We want to become those we are—the new, the unique, the incomparable, the self-legislators, the self-creators. [Wir aber wollendie werden, die wir sind—die Neuen, die Einmaligen, die Unvergleickbaren, die Sich-selber-Gesetzgebenden, die Sich-selber-Schaffenden!] (GS 336, 1882)Verily, the individual himself [der Einselne selber] is still the most recent invention. (Z I:15, 1883)My philosophy aims at an ordering of rank: not at an individualistic morality. (WP 287, from the notebooks of 1886–87)If we place ourselves at the end of this tremendous process . . . ,where society and the morality of custom at last reveal what theyhave simply been the means to: then we discover that the ripest fruit is the sovereign individual [souveräne Individuum], like only tohimself, liberated again from the morality of custom, autonomous and supramoral . . . , in short, the man who has his own independent,protracted will and the right to make promises. (GM II:2, 1887)Every particular individual [ Jeder einzelne] may be regarded as representing the ascending or descending line of life. When onehas decided which, one has thereby established a canon for the value of his egoism. If he represents the ascending line his valueis in fact extraordinary. . . . If he represents the descending development . . . , then he can be accorded little value. (TI “Skirmishes”33, 1888)The particular person, the ‘individual’ [Der einzelne, das ‘Individuum’], as people and philosophers have hitherto understood him,is an error: he does not constitute a separate entity, an atom, a ‘link in the chain,’ something merely inherited from the past—heconstitutes the entire single line ‘Mensch’ up to and including himself. (TI “Skirmishes” 33, 1888)Goethe conceived of a strong, highly cultured human being, skilled in all physical accomplishments, who, keeping himself incheck and having reverence for himself, dares to allow himself the whole compass and wealth of naturalness, who is strongenough for this freedom. . . . A spirit thus emancipated stands in the midst of the universe with a joyful and trusting fatalism, inthe faith that only the particular individual [das Einzelne] may be rejected, that in the totality everything is redeemed and affirmed.. . . But such a faith is the highest of all possible faiths: I have baptized it with the name Dionysus. (TI “Skirmishes” 49)

100. International Studies in Philosophy: Volume > 38 > Issue: 3
Tamsin Shaw

view |  rights & permissions | cited by