Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 21-40 of 442 documents


21. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

22. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Kolby Granville

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

23. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
C.M. Selbrede

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Would you accept a personality replacement? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Stanley is an awkward kid growing up to be an awkward adult. He struggles with depression, ADHD, anxiety, and just generally fitting in. He struggles to make friends in high school, and has only one friend in college, although his anxiety keeps him from spending too much time with him. In short, life, at least from Stanley’s perspective, is a never-ending string of misery. Echo is a new technology marketed as a “personality replacement.” First used to reform criminals, it is now being offered to the public to correct various mental disorders. Much to the frustration of his sister and college friend, Stanley pays to be Echoed, and is reborn a happy, confident, and different, person.

24. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Ian Creasey

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Should we patch our brain for better performance? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Peter Lonsdale is the creator of a Campaign Against Intellectual Discrimination; a worldwide effort to stop discrimination of those with lower mental abilities. As part of his pursuit, he created the company CAID, which focuses on brain patches that rewire the brain for intelligence, patience, focus, and other traits. Peter, as the founder and chief evangelist for patches, has taken more than he can count, probably 100’s. When the press gets a leaked scanned of his brain, showing just how many patches “Pincushion Pete” has taken over the year, it’s a public relations nightmare. Peter is forced to resign as head of the company he founded, and reflect on how to spin the story to allow for a comeback. Whatever course he takes to orchestrate his comeback, he’s going to do it with his patches in place. Nothing is coming out.

25. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Meg Groff

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
At what point should a child be taken away from their parents? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Lydia Lowry has a problem, the government is going to take her child away and put her in foster care. However, they have a reason, Lydia’s trailer is a disaster; it’s practically a biohazard. Lydia goes to visit the narrator, an attorney, in the hopes that she can help her keep her child. The narrator, no fan of child protective services, gets a few friends to agree to head out to Lydia’s house to clean it and get the government off her back. When they arrive, they find a mobile home covered in cat urine and feces, no hot water, and a pile of trash four feet high in the front yard. After several hours of cleaning, the narrator and her friends get dizzy from the toxic fumes. They give up on cleaning, and leave. The narrator is able to convince Lydia the best course of action is to have her daughter move to California and live with their better-off relatives until she turns eighteen. It’s not exactly a classic success story, but the narrator tells herself, not every story is.

26. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Stuart Pennebaker

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Should everyone be a parent, at least for a summer? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, the narrator lives in a dystopian future where climate change has made it illegal to have children without government permission. This has given rise to super realistic robot children that can be purchased or, for those that can’t afford to purchase, rented. The narrator has a strong desire to be a mother and has, for the last 10 years, rented the same seven- and five-year-old robot girls each summer to parent. It’s an expensive habit, but she loves her summers taking her “children” to the local swimming pool. She loves reading them stories at bedtime, and tucking them in. As the summer winds down, trauma hits as one of her girls shuts down. She has reached the end of her service cycle. The narrator is devastated by the loss of her child, even though her younger daughter hardly seems to notice the loss at all.

27. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
R.K. Tilton

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
How much science does the government need to change policy? In this philosophical short story fiction, Dr. Robert Flose is a botanist studying plants. For many years now, eating meat has been banned, but Dr. Flose has concerns about plants as well. Finally, he devises a tool that is able to measure levels of thought, feeling, and sentience, in all things. Much to his surprise, he finds plants are a higher life form than both humans and animals. And, unlike animals, they continue to live when separated from their base plant. In fact, the very salad on his plate screams out when it is eaten, if only humans had the tools to hear it. Dr. Flose presents his findings to the President, and is sent to a top-secret base to continue his research. His research confirms his findings again and again as he becomes increasingly more concerned about the daily genocide happening on dinner plates across the world. In the end, the government has him killed.

28. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Keeley Burmeister

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
How do you help an alcoholic? When, if ever, do you leave them? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Raymond and Dorothy are married. They met in a bar after college and moved to the big city for Raymond to start a job and Dorothy to raise their children. Dorothy was never a good cook, but Raymond could always make a good martini. As time passes and the children grow up, stay-at-home Dorothy leans more and more on the bottle. Things come to a head when Raymond comes home from work and finds Dorothy passed on the floor of their bedroom. He wants to help, but doesn’t know how. He decides the best thing to do is to open a local gallery for one of their children to display and sell her art. Dorothy, he thinks, can run the shop and get out of the house. The gallery opening is a success, but Dorothy is busy sneaking a drink in the bathroom. It seems she is not yet ready to get sober.

29. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Sarah Johnson

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Are the pious loved by the gods because they are pious, or are they pious because they are loved by the gods?” In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Professor Adamson and the narrator discuss Euthyphro’s dilemma. The narrator is invited by her professor to follow her into the woods and to meet a reclusive revolutionary leader. The professor, and the revolutionary group, want to overthrow the government because voting rights, and other civil rights, have been severely restricted by the government. The legal ability to change the government through voting is a “near impossibility.” On her way to meet the leader, the narrator meets an angel who informs her that the future revolution will fail, and many will be hurt in the process. The angel tells the narrator she must kill her professor to help humanity. The narrator is unsure what to do and, during their walk, discusses the dilemma she is in; a practical application of Euthyphro’s dilemma. The story ends in the final moment, knife in hand, when the narrator is about to decide what she will do.

30. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

31. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

32. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
Kolby Granville

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

33. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
Lise Halpern

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Does a triumphant marriage require love? In this philosophical short story, Donna wed her high school sweetheart, nurtured three splendid offspring, only to find herself gradually adrift in emotional detachment from her husband. With her spouse laboring in a distant city, their encounters dwindle, and when they do occur, separate beds are the norm. Amidst a supportive yet ardor-deficient matrimony, Donna crosses paths with Chris, a local carpenter. An unconventional connection sparks, ultimately propelling her into an affair. The eventual decision to divorce her husband for the sake of newfound love sees her embracing Chris, a man deemed less conventionally attractive and materially successful. This choice ignites fury within her children, who lay blame on Donna for the divorce.

34. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
M.C. Schmidt

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Are you duty bound to stop a dubious transaction? In this tale of philosophical short fiction, Ann Marie, a freshly anointed notary’s first client is an elderly woman endeavoring to relinquish her dwelling to “Father,” the enigmatic figurehead of a cult. Ann Marie declines the notary job, as the deed transfer requires both an attesting witness and the beneficiary—neither of which is present. She recounts this incident to a friend. This leads her footsteps to the aged woman’s abode, where a serendipitous encounter with the woman’s son ensues. She leans he has emancipated his mother from the cult’s influence and has forcefully put her into a de-programming facility. However, a looming choice weighs upon him: the possibility of selling her home to fund her transition into a long-term care facility, for her own good.

35. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
Thea Swanson

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
What would society be if women were independent of men’s influence? Within this philosophical short story, Marlee is encouraged by her doctor’s counsel to stop her long-standing use of birth control pills—medication she has taken since the age of 19. This decision unveils a novel perspective as Marlee navigates the urban landscape through fresh eyes. Struck by epiphany, she questions the compulsion to engage in detached intimacy to bolster her husband’s self-esteem. A broader realization dawns upon her—how many times has she intertwined with men merely to seek their validation? Perhaps for the first time in her life, she confronts the inquiry: why does she require men’s presence at all? Conventional norms dictate women’s reliance on men—for their financial prowess, protection, and for procreation. However, emancipated from these societal pressures, Marlee’s introspection leads her to ponder the fundamental necessity of intimate relationships with men.

36. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
Penny Milam

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Is it moral to end your 14-year-old daughters’ pregnancy against her will? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Megan’s father is divorced. 14-year-old Megan visits her father on weekends. One weekend she begs to go to the local farmers market, only for her father to find out her real motive, to visit a Senior in her High School running a wild honey stall. Her father takes the hint, and gives them time to socialize. For the next few weeks Megan cancels her weekend visits. Only on the fourth weekend does she confess the truth; she is pregnant with the Senior’s baby, and intends to keep it. Her father is furious, but realizes his fury is pushing his daughter away. Instead, he decides to allege his support and provide her with prenatal vitamins, which are really an abortion pill. He feels he has saved her future, but someday he knows she will learn the truth.

37. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
Deborah Serra

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Do you owe others your continued living? In this philosophical short story fiction, Danny opens a disturbing letter from his elderly sister. He immediately rushes to his car, his wife chasing after him. He frantically drives to his sister’s house as his wife, in a panic, reads the letter that prompted Danny’s urgency. It is a letter from Danny’s sister saying goodbye. At 70+ years old, she is bored with life and is ready to die. She isn’t sick, she is simply choosing non-participation. Danny argues it is selfish for her to end her life, while his wife is more understanding. His wife argues that a life without purpose might not be worth living, and that it’s not selfish to end your life when you are ready to do so. Danny and his wife arrive at his sister’s door and Danny attempts to break it down while his wife tries to calm him, and explain the letter is postmarked four days ago. His sister is already dead.

38. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
Mark Braidwood

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Should we know the story of the lives of those who produce the products we purchase? Do we have an obligation to only buy ethically sourced goods? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Jack Benson gives his child a prototype toy from his company as a Christmas present. When they check the toy battery compartment, they find a sad poem written in Chinese. Jack decides to fly to China and visit the factory where the toy is produced. He pays an employee to read the poem over the factory floor loudspeaker. A woman on the factory line stands up in acknowledgement, then humbly returns to her work. Later, after the shift, she slips him a book of her writings, presumably, expressing more thoughts and emotions about her life.

39. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12
Charles Williams

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
At what point is a discussion a debate; at what point is it undue pressure? Is all unwanted pressure a kind of manipulation and violence? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, the narrator is invited by his father to go duck hunting as part of their bonding time. The narrator wants to spend time with his father, but expresses ethical concerns about hunting ducks. The father asserts hunting is a natural part of human evolution. The debate continues as the narrator decides to go on the hunt, but is undecided if he will pull the trigger. The story ends with father and son in the blind just at the moment before the narrator must decide if he is going to pull the trigger.

40. After Dinner Conversation: Volume > 4 > Issue: 12

view |  rights & permissions | cited by