61.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Emilia Angelova
Time’s Disquiet and Unrest:
Between Heidegger and Levinas
|
|
|
62.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Fred Dallmayr
Agency and Letting-Be:
Heidegger on Primordial Praxis
|
|
|
63.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Lauren Freeman
“I am you, if I am I”:
A Feminist Approach to Selfhood and the Other in the Thinking of Martin Heidegger
|
|
|
64.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Robert D. Stolorow
Trauma and Human Existence:
The Mutual Enrichment of Heidegger’s Existential Analytic and a Psychoanalytic Understanding of Trauma
|
|
|
65.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Lou Agosta
Response to Robert D. Stolorow
|
|
|
66.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Andrew J. Mitchell
Heidegger Among the Sculptors:
Ernst Barlach and the Materiality of Production
|
|
|
67.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Trish Glazebrook
Heidegger and Ecophenomenology
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
This paper is an application of Heidegger’s work to issues in sustainability and environmental justice that demonstrates the value and significance of his work beyond traditional contexts for analysis of his thinking. It argues that Heidegger prompts a constructive environmental phenomenology, which is developed around three themes: physics and teleology; dwelling in nature; and the social obligations of the sciences. Aristotle’s Physics is shown to provide Heidegger with a teleological conception of nature that promotes its intrinsic value. This analysis is used toward an environmental ethics of “dwelling,” in contrast to consumer culture’s reduction of nature to resource. Finally, Heidegger’s potential contribution to debates concerning the social obligations of the sciences is developed. Throughout these analyses, his work is connected with principles of deep ecology, social ecology and ecofeminism, and his applicability to environmental issues in international development is demonstrated. In conclusion, Heideggerian ecophenomenology is argued to promote sustainability and environmental justice insofar as it supports an alternative to the logic of domination currently overrunning the globe.
|
|
|
68.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Brendan Mahoney
Da-sein’s Earthly Body: Ethos as Eco-logic
|
|
|
69.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Graeme Nicholson
Untruth in the Theaetetus: Lectures from 1933-34
|
|
|
70.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Daniel Dahlstrom
Thinking of Nothing:
Heidegger’s Criticism of Hegel’s Conception of Negativity
|
|
|
71.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Shane Ewegen
A Unity of Opposites:
Heidegger’s Journey through Plato
|
|
|
72.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43
Babette Babich
The Ister: Between the Documentary and Heidegger’s Lecture Course:
Reading Philosophy, Politics, and Technology between Hölderlin and Milton
|
|
|
73.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
William J. Richardson
In Memoriam: Manfred S. Frings (1925-2008)
|
|
|
74.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
Theodore Kisiel
In Memoriam Joseph J. Kockelmans
|
|
|
75.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
Carolyn Culbertson
Remarks on Pol Vandevelde’s "Translation as Potentialization"
|
|
|
76.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
Graeme Nicholson
Addendum to Graeme Nicholson, "Untruth in the Theaetetus" (Proceedings, p. 209)
|
|
|
77.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
Theodore Kisiel
Commentary on Robert Crease’s "Formal Indicators and Scientific Concepts"
|
|
|
78.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
Benjamin Crowe
Commentary on Anne O’Byrne’s "Metontology and the Metaphysics of Existence"
|
|
|
79.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
Lawrence J. Hatab
Commentary on Eric Mohr’s "Scheler’s More Fundamental Ontology"
|
|
|
80.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
43 >
Issue: Supplement
Charles Guignon
Response to Fred Dallmayr’s "Agency and Letting-Be"
|
|
|